Business Lawyers Network**Signup**
Date: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 7:30am
Topic: "Health Insurance & Retirement Solutions for Small and Solo Firms"
Speakers: Bruce Crohn of Bruce Crohn, LLC on Employee Benefits; and Ryan Brockhouse and Bill Frain of ADP on Effective Use of Retirement Plans
At some point, all employers will be in the unenviable position of wanting or needing to terminate an employee. Given the emotional consequences of being fired, coupled with the difficult job market, many terminated employees will sue or threaten to sue their former employer. Offering a departing employee a separation agreement can be an effective step to minimize exposure to employment claims and the costly litigation that ensues. Under such an agreement, the employer offers the terminated employee something to which he is not otherwise entitled (usually money or benefits).
December 12, 2012
Governor Patrick’s administration announced this week that it intends to launch a study to define the scope and financial costs to the state from the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. According to Governor Patrick’s secretary of labor and workforce development, Joanne Goldstein, the practice of misclassification “deprives the state of revenue,” including avoidance of unemployment and payroll taxes, and also can deprive workers of health insurance, retirement benefits and safe working conditions.
Let’s assume it takes Jane an hour to commute to work in Boston. On Friday, Jane is going to a conference in Springfield, and her commute will take two hours each way. Does Jane’s employer have to compensate her for the extra time it takes her to get to Springfield? The answer to this question – and others like it – will help employers determine whether time spent “on the road” by non-exempt employees (that is, employees entitled to overtime) is commuting time, which need not be compensated, or “travel time” which must be compensated.